Home

Mid-February saw the annual State of the Arts conference, which I previewed here and here for The Guardian Culture Professionals Network.

Many of the sector’s most talented, experienced and knowledgeable people were present.  From that perspective it provided many exciting moments in terms of the conversations that took place between the timetabled sessions and around the edges of the day. But it wasn’t really a conference in any traditional meaning of the word. No issues were genuinely debated and no resolutions were passed. As Gillian Nicol in a-n points out the day was “highly controlled and tightly curated”.  Artist Hannah Nicklin tweeted, or retweeted, the eloquent: “THERE ARE SO MANY ELEPHANTS IN THESE ROOMS”.

A tremendous amount of work went into the event, which was intense and vivid.  But it didn’t acknowledge the considerable collective resource available –  that is, the delegates –  or find ways in which their collective expertise could be drawn upon to the sector’s advantage.

It seems to me – and to others, judging from the public commentary – that if  there is to be a State of the Arts 2013, it would benefit from being clearer about its purpose and to be allowed to take more risks.  That purpose could usefully be either or both of these:

1. To provide inspiration, ideas and leadership for the sector  (requiring less modification from the current model).

2. To decide to be of practical use to the sector by structuring it more along the “unconference” or “culture hack” models. These new forms seek to harness the intelligence and experience of delegates to discuss and problem solve on specific areas, with ideas taken forward after the event.

In the exhausted aftermath, I wrote a rather scathing polemic about it for the New Statesman, which you can read here.

For a report of the day as it happened, read The Guardian’s live blog and its social media round-up. For other interesting and varied contributions, the sota blog platform curated by artist’s Hannah Nicklin and Andy Field covers a range of perspectives.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “State of the Arts 2012

  1. Hats off for writing the New Statesman article. A very strong piece. Somebody had to name the ‘elephants in the room’ and you did! Please consider running for SoS for Culture at some point in your career. 😉

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s